Among the significant happenings during DOEs Energy Star webcast was a statement from utility company Pacific Gas and Electric that they will not recognize products qualified under EPAs crtiteria, writes Brian Owen. Held on Thursday, June 26, the DOE Energy Star for SSL web conference was Energy Star for SSL: Getting Ready for September 30 got off to a great start as the attendance to the webcast climbed to 200 connections at one point (the DOE said that there are usually between 1 And 2 people per connection).
While covering all of the key salient points of the Energy Star Criteria for SSL Version 1.0, that are now considered second nature, the DOE reaffirmed and stressed their serious and sincere intention to assure the qualification of only quality SSL product coming to market and to protect The Energy Star brand.
Jeff McCullough, Senior Research Engineer, Technology, Planning & Deployment at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) identified and outlined the strengths of the DOEs Solid State Lighting Program Requirements Version 1.0, which clearly identified why 1.0 is the appropriate criteria for SSL and why the DOE has and will continue to be the appropriate body to implement the program.
McCullough covered important aspects, such as In Situ and UL 1598 testing and Quality Assurance Testing, as well as the Future Strategy, including the proposed additions to Category A and 'Ratcheting', as reported previously by LEDs Magazine - see Energy Star for SSL gets Energetic start (May 2008) .
Also discussed was the progression leading to the September 30th go live date, which will proceed as planned. Energy Star Partnership Agreements will become available in July, and an online product application submission is scheduled for August. It is expected this will lead to the availability Of Energy Star SSL products in time for the September 30 launch.
Many resources will become available for manufacturers and there will be an extensive awareness and education program for end-users, including common messaging. As the market transcends to SSL, it will still be stressed that "CFLs are not the Enemy!"
The EPA issue
Richard Karney, DOE Energy Star Products & Program Manager, addressed the current DOE - EPA Energy Star issue Energy Star Wars and the battle to label LED fixtures (June 2008) , commenting, "The Department understands the concerns Energy Star interests have towards the present Conflict between DOEs Solid State Lighting Program requirements version 1.0 and EPAs Residential Light Fixture criteria version 4.2. We want you to know DOE is doing all it can to resolve the issues as quickly as possible."
Karney repeated the June 13 statement of DOE Deputy Assistant Secretary David Rodgers, "DOE is aware of the confusion created by EPAs release of the amended criteria. Efforts to resolve this confusion are on-going - in the meantime, the September 2007 guidance stands as The valid guidance for SSL.
Karney added significant to this statement: "There is direct conflict between EPAs version 4.2, and DOEs version 1.0 and the additional Category A applications soon to be shared for public review and comment. The criteria are not complementary, nor was DOE consulted. In fact , DOE learned about version 4.2 at the same time you did!
Two criteria occupying the same space will only create market confusion, increase program costs with duplicative marketing efforts, points-of-contact, etc. and ultimately harm the Energy Star brand. DOE is focused on resolving the issue quickly and we ask your patience during this period of confusion.
DOE is committed to maintaining the open process that is the cornerstone of the Energy Star program. We value your participation and input.
We will continue to focus on product quality ensuing end-user satisfaction with the technology and maintaining the trust placed by consumers in the Energy Star label. That confidence comes from the open process in establishing criteria and the use of standards and test procedures that are recognized By the lighting industry and developed through a consensus process. The solid-state lighting industry is in the early states of its development and it is important to lay the infrastructure necessary to support Future activities.
Hastily developed non-industry consensus standards or test procedures only serve to undermine the technology and delay market introduction, potentially setting us down the same early path of CFLs. DOE will not let that happen.
DOE will move forward with launching the first-ever Energy Star criteria for SSL on September 30, 2008 and keep pace with the technology as it evolves.
Q&A (with answers!)
After the 60-minute webcast program, there was no shortage of good questions filling the remaining half hour, and all were fielded with appropriate answers from the DOE team (in contrast with the EPA webcast of June 24 ?C see EPA hosts low-key Webcast on Energy Star ). The DOE promised to answer all questions remaining by posting responses on their website.
During the Q&A, Richard Karney read a comment from Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) outlining their position regarding the EPA RLF 4.2. Much like Efficiency Vermont, PG&E has chosen to not employ or utilize the 4.2 specifications at this time.
PG&E went on to the usage with their incentive programs, the subject of a previous article in LEDs Magazine - see Efficiency Vermont decides not to use EPA Energy Star spec . PG&E posed the question, “Has DOE been contacted by manufacturers or customers who share This concern and are confused? Karney explained that they (DOE) had received numerous questions from both manufacturers and end-users, and that they (DOE) are working diligently to seek a resolution that will address the concerns and end the confusion.
Following the webcast. LEDs Magazine received the following quote from Mary Matteson Bryan, Lighting Portfolio Manager for Emerging Technologies at Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) which formed the preamble to her question during the webcast:
"With the release of RLF 4.2, PG&E is very concerned about potential marketplace confusion with two different SSL Energy Star specifications in place. In fact, until the current issues over Energy Star for SSL are resolved, PG&E does not plan to include products qualified under The EPA RLF 4.2 specification in our incentive programs."
Other questions surrounded the expenses incurred by manufacturers to develop quality product according to quality criteria, which could be rendered "useless" by the EPA's actions. The DOE addressed a question as to the the LED replacement to the linear fluorescent has not been considered in the The upcoming Category A additions (as previously reported in LEDs Magazine) and Jeff McCullough responded with the results of testing to date, the lack of energy savings and relative payback, as well as government fiscal responsibility to focus on products which are currently viable.
It was also asked about whether Energy Star will add to the cost of products and DOE recognized this in the process. It was reaffirmed by DOE that absolute photometry is required and not relative photometry. Asked why the Power Factor of 0.7 or greater for residential applications Was so low, McCullough responded with the fact that it is actually much higher than 0.5 which was originally considered acceptable for CFLs and that the commercial threshold of 0.9 or greater is much higher as commercial customers can be penalized by utilities.
Now with the chiming in of both Efficiency Vermont and PG&E and with all questions answered to date with the exception of one, the only question remaining is what is on the mind of the EPA at this juncture. It's time for the EPA to raise the ' White flag' on the 'white light' issue. There is another EPA webcast slated for July 8th. Once again, stay tuned!
Message from Jim Brodrick
Jim Brodrick, who heads the DOEs Solid State Lighting program, circulated an open email on June 30 with an update on Energy Star and the program in general.
View Brodricks message on the World of LEDs blog (and make comments if you wish). About the Author Brian Owen , a contributing editor of LEDs Magazine , is also the Program Advisor to greenTbiz , which facilitates the LED City Toronto initiative. He is actively In the development and operation of energy conservation programs for government, municipalities and utilities and specializes in capacity building, commercialization and market transformation. greenTbiz provides energy conservation and environmental awareness programs to the small business sector in Toronto, Canada.
While covering all of the key salient points of the Energy Star Criteria for SSL Version 1.0, that are now considered second nature, the DOE reaffirmed and stressed their serious and sincere intention to assure the qualification of only quality SSL product coming to market and to protect The Energy Star brand.
Jeff McCullough, Senior Research Engineer, Technology, Planning & Deployment at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) identified and outlined the strengths of the DOEs Solid State Lighting Program Requirements Version 1.0, which clearly identified why 1.0 is the appropriate criteria for SSL and why the DOE has and will continue to be the appropriate body to implement the program.
McCullough covered important aspects, such as In Situ and UL 1598 testing and Quality Assurance Testing, as well as the Future Strategy, including the proposed additions to Category A and 'Ratcheting', as reported previously by LEDs Magazine - see Energy Star for SSL gets Energetic start (May 2008) .
Also discussed was the progression leading to the September 30th go live date, which will proceed as planned. Energy Star Partnership Agreements will become available in July, and an online product application submission is scheduled for August. It is expected this will lead to the availability Of Energy Star SSL products in time for the September 30 launch.
Many resources will become available for manufacturers and there will be an extensive awareness and education program for end-users, including common messaging. As the market transcends to SSL, it will still be stressed that "CFLs are not the Enemy!"
The EPA issue
Richard Karney, DOE Energy Star Products & Program Manager, addressed the current DOE - EPA Energy Star issue Energy Star Wars and the battle to label LED fixtures (June 2008) , commenting, "The Department understands the concerns Energy Star interests have towards the present Conflict between DOEs Solid State Lighting Program requirements version 1.0 and EPAs Residential Light Fixture criteria version 4.2. We want you to know DOE is doing all it can to resolve the issues as quickly as possible."
Karney repeated the June 13 statement of DOE Deputy Assistant Secretary David Rodgers, "DOE is aware of the confusion created by EPAs release of the amended criteria. Efforts to resolve this confusion are on-going - in the meantime, the September 2007 guidance stands as The valid guidance for SSL.
Karney added significant to this statement: "There is direct conflict between EPAs version 4.2, and DOEs version 1.0 and the additional Category A applications soon to be shared for public review and comment. The criteria are not complementary, nor was DOE consulted. In fact , DOE learned about version 4.2 at the same time you did!
Two criteria occupying the same space will only create market confusion, increase program costs with duplicative marketing efforts, points-of-contact, etc. and ultimately harm the Energy Star brand. DOE is focused on resolving the issue quickly and we ask your patience during this period of confusion.
DOE is committed to maintaining the open process that is the cornerstone of the Energy Star program. We value your participation and input.
We will continue to focus on product quality ensuing end-user satisfaction with the technology and maintaining the trust placed by consumers in the Energy Star label. That confidence comes from the open process in establishing criteria and the use of standards and test procedures that are recognized By the lighting industry and developed through a consensus process. The solid-state lighting industry is in the early states of its development and it is important to lay the infrastructure necessary to support Future activities.
Hastily developed non-industry consensus standards or test procedures only serve to undermine the technology and delay market introduction, potentially setting us down the same early path of CFLs. DOE will not let that happen.
DOE will move forward with launching the first-ever Energy Star criteria for SSL on September 30, 2008 and keep pace with the technology as it evolves.
Q&A (with answers!)
After the 60-minute webcast program, there was no shortage of good questions filling the remaining half hour, and all were fielded with appropriate answers from the DOE team (in contrast with the EPA webcast of June 24 ?C see EPA hosts low-key Webcast on Energy Star ). The DOE promised to answer all questions remaining by posting responses on their website.
During the Q&A, Richard Karney read a comment from Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) outlining their position regarding the EPA RLF 4.2. Much like Efficiency Vermont, PG&E has chosen to not employ or utilize the 4.2 specifications at this time.
PG&E went on to the usage with their incentive programs, the subject of a previous article in LEDs Magazine - see Efficiency Vermont decides not to use EPA Energy Star spec . PG&E posed the question, “Has DOE been contacted by manufacturers or customers who share This concern and are confused? Karney explained that they (DOE) had received numerous questions from both manufacturers and end-users, and that they (DOE) are working diligently to seek a resolution that will address the concerns and end the confusion.
Following the webcast. LEDs Magazine received the following quote from Mary Matteson Bryan, Lighting Portfolio Manager for Emerging Technologies at Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) which formed the preamble to her question during the webcast:
"With the release of RLF 4.2, PG&E is very concerned about potential marketplace confusion with two different SSL Energy Star specifications in place. In fact, until the current issues over Energy Star for SSL are resolved, PG&E does not plan to include products qualified under The EPA RLF 4.2 specification in our incentive programs."
Other questions surrounded the expenses incurred by manufacturers to develop quality product according to quality criteria, which could be rendered "useless" by the EPA's actions. The DOE addressed a question as to the the LED replacement to the linear fluorescent has not been considered in the The upcoming Category A additions (as previously reported in LEDs Magazine) and Jeff McCullough responded with the results of testing to date, the lack of energy savings and relative payback, as well as government fiscal responsibility to focus on products which are currently viable.
It was also asked about whether Energy Star will add to the cost of products and DOE recognized this in the process. It was reaffirmed by DOE that absolute photometry is required and not relative photometry. Asked why the Power Factor of 0.7 or greater for residential applications Was so low, McCullough responded with the fact that it is actually much higher than 0.5 which was originally considered acceptable for CFLs and that the commercial threshold of 0.9 or greater is much higher as commercial customers can be penalized by utilities.
Now with the chiming in of both Efficiency Vermont and PG&E and with all questions answered to date with the exception of one, the only question remaining is what is on the mind of the EPA at this juncture. It's time for the EPA to raise the ' White flag' on the 'white light' issue. There is another EPA webcast slated for July 8th. Once again, stay tuned!
Message from Jim Brodrick
Jim Brodrick, who heads the DOEs Solid State Lighting program, circulated an open email on June 30 with an update on Energy Star and the program in general.
View Brodricks message on the World of LEDs blog (and make comments if you wish). About the Author Brian Owen , a contributing editor of LEDs Magazine , is also the Program Advisor to greenTbiz , which facilitates the LED City Toronto initiative. He is actively In the development and operation of energy conservation programs for government, municipalities and utilities and specializes in capacity building, commercialization and market transformation. greenTbiz provides energy conservation and environmental awareness programs to the small business sector in Toronto, Canada.
Face Plate,electrical face plates,cat6 faceplate,face plates
NINGBO UONICORE ELECTRONICS CO., LTD , https://www.uniconmelectronics.com